Compare Force Kargo King Star vs Force Shaktiman 200

Compare force kargo king star vs force shaktiman 200


https://res.cloudinary.com/dz4x78ghb/image/fetch/c_scale,q_30,w_300,f_auto/https://www.trucksbuses.com/uploads/530_2248b3fc1ef14b7eb3960ce53f0c63c3force-kargo-king-star-pickup-truck-removebg-preview.png

Force Kargo King Star

https://res.cloudinary.com/dz4x78ghb/image/fetch/c_scale,q_30,w_300,f_auto/https://www.trucksbuses.com/uploads/542_564d8297072a4346b73ebb74a0fd5785Force_Shaktiman_200_Pickup_Truck-removebg-preview.png

Force Shaktiman 200

  • Overviewof force kargo king star vs force shaktiman 200

  • Power
    67 HP@3200 rpm
    67 HP@3200 rpm
  • Torque
    175 Nm@1600-2400 rpm
    175 Nm@1600-2400 rpm
  • Payload
    1250 kg
    1750 Kg (FSD); 1700 Kg (HSD)
  • Body Size
    8.01 ft x 5.28 ft
    9.03 ft x 5.38 ft
  • Warranty
    3 years / 3 Lakh Km
    3 years / 3 Lakh Km
  • Engine & Performanceof force kargo king star vs force shaktiman 200

  • Engine
    FM 2.0 CR
    FM 2.0 CR
  • Power
    67 HP@3200 rpm
    67 HP@3200 rpm
  • Torque
    175 Nm@1600-2400 rpm
    175 Nm@1600-2400 rpm
  • Displacement
    1947 cc
    1947 cc
  • Cylinders
    3
    3
  • Transmission
    5 speed manual (5F+1R)
    Overdrive gearbox
    5 speed manual (5F+1R)
    Overdrive gearbox
  • Gearbox
    Synchromesh
    Synchromesh
  • Emission
    BSIV
    BSIV
  • Fuel Type
    Diesel
    Diesel
  • Fuel Tank
    45 Litres
  • Design & Configurationof force kargo king star vs force shaktiman 200

  • Body Size
    8.01 ft x 5.28 ft
    9.03 ft x 5.38 ft
  • Variants
    Cabin with Flat bed load body; Cabin and chassis
    Cabin with Fixed Side Deck; Cabin with High Side Deck
  • GVW
    2990 Kg
    3475 Kg
  • Payload
    1250 kg
    1750 Kg (FSD); 1700 Kg (HSD)
  • Seating Capacity
    D+1; D+2 (Optional)
    D+1
  • Axle Configuration
    4x2
    4x2
  • Front Suspension
    Semi elliptical leaf springs
    With hydraulic telescopic shock absorbers
    Rigid with parabolic leaf spring
    With hydraulic telescopic shock absorbers
    With stablizer bar
  • Rear Suspension
    Semi elliptical leaf springs
    With hydraulic telescopic shock absorbers
    Rigid with leaf spring
    With hydraulic telescopic shock absorbers
  • Anti Roll Bar
    Front only
  • Tyres
    7.00 R15
    215/75 R 15
  • Wheelbase
    3000 mm
    2770 mm
  • Ground Clearance
    210 mm
    200 mm
  • Overall Length
    5032 mm
    4725 mm
  • Overall Width
    1746 mm
    1807 mm
  • Overall Height
    2105 mm
    2750 mm (HSD)
    2315 mm (FSD)
  • Steering
    Mechanical type
    Power Steering (Optional)
    Mechanical type
    Power Steering (Optional)
  • Steering Adjustment
  • Features & Comfortof force kargo king star vs force shaktiman 200

  • Driver Seat
    Standard seat with high head rest
    Standard seat
  • Air Conditioner AC
  • Mobile Charging Point
  • Safetyof force kargo king star vs force shaktiman 200

  • Service Brakes
    Hydraulic vacuum assisted
    Front: Disc
    Rear: Drum with LSV
    Front: Hydraulic Disc
    Rear: Hydraulic Drum
    With automatic wear adjuster
  • Parking Brakes
    Mechanical acting on Rear Wheels
    Mechanical, acting on rear wheels
  • Seat Belts
  • Anti Roll Bar
    Front only

Key Comparison of Force Kargo King Star vs Force Shaktiman 200

Compare Force Kargo King Star vs Force Shaktiman 200 in detail at TrucksBuses.com ! Force Kargo King Star offers a payload capacity of 1250 kg and gives a power of 67 HP@3200 rpm whereas Force Shaktiman 200 produces 67 HP@3200 rpm of power and comes with payload of 1750 Kg (FSD); 1700 Kg (HSD). Powering the Force Kargo King Star small commercial vehicle is 1947 cc engine. Force Shaktiman 200 gets powered by a 1947 cc engine. Future buyers can check detailed pickup and mini truck comparison of Force Kargo King Star with Force Shaktiman 200 on the basis of engine, specifications, payload, price, mileage and features. Force Kargo King Star comes with a load body size of 8.01 ft x 5.28 ft whereas Force Shaktiman 200 offers a deck size of 9.03 ft x 5.38 ft.’

Compare

Popular Range